The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!
Has Political Correctness gone too far?
in Politics
Debra AI Prediction
Arguments
Political Correctness
Synonym- Censorship
Antonym- Free Speech
*Not an actual thesaurus
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 32%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 80%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 38%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.52  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 73%  
  Learn More About Debra
Political correctness, do you mean has the movement way from united state constitutional principle for the common defense of the general welfare gone past a point of legal impartiality?
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Much of the language used is not a Free-speech issue as the freedom of speech is often used as a short explanation for a First Amendment quotation. The use of many slang words becomes a method to how grievance is filed.
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
I prefer it this way, however. It is better when I can speak my mind and only be verbally attacked in response - than prosecuted, as it was in the past, and as it still is in the vast majority of countries. In China criticism of communism will get you imprisoned for a very long time; in the US, offending someone based on race, at worst, will initiate a public hate campaign against you. Some Western countries do punish people for being overly politically incorrect, but in the majority of them it is merely individual excesses of the system of justice, rather than a systematic effect.
At its origin, political correctness arose as a way to promote a productive dialogue despite possible disagreements between the parties. For example, the US government and the Chinese government are at an impasse - and political correctness is tasked to assure that they can still perform civilized negotiations, rather than bark at each other and wage wars. A good concept in itself, it can be easily twisted by those using it to cover for their individual shortcomings into an abomination which we see everywhere.
Civilized discussion in the face of strong disagreements is important. Censorship is malicious. Political correctness tries to act as the middle ground - but, in all fairness, there can be no middle ground. Either speech is censored (whether by law, or by public pressure), or it is not. There is no in between.
  Considerate: 73%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
Neither political correctness, nor justice is a united state in a general welfare by definition of truth, and whole truth. In an example of axiom created by use of problem creation, or its resolution by principle to problem solving as a basic understanding. Censorship can only be performed when any claim of amendment to a United State Constitution separation never takes place to begin with, is not upheld, or the separation is taken out of context by the union to be held by both parties agreed upon by constitutional united state. The agreement made prior is censorships happens and the burden is then shared as a general welfare to the public.
United state, we hold these truths to be self-evident, the truth is self-evident to be connected to the whole truth by explanation made, axiom. Be it rational, or irrational. The argument of Freedom of Speech is bound by the meaning of the word free which is set to have. One: no self-value, Two: no applied cost. Otherwise the topic is then grievance and not free in any way which is described in an official order of separation to be followed in writing.
Censorship – Versus - Due process of constitutional separation. A choice to place oneself inside a direction of judicial separation in resolution of public grievance mandates the censorship as part of the process as a whole truth, the truth to protect the general welfare. If it is not self-imposed it can be done by actions of governing legislation as oversight regulation to independence.
Sounds complex but is much easier to perform.  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.8  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 79%  
  Learn More About Debra
Ha. Ha. Ha, Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p6M-VgXHwwdpJarhyQYapBz-kRc6FrgdOLFAd3IfYz8/edit
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 1%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 0.76  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra